Last week, yet another request for Director Review shined a light on what has become the seedy underbelly of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). In Innoscience Technology Co. LTD., v. Efficient Power Conversion Corp. (IPR2023-01381), not only did the PTAB institute a challenge brought by a China-based infringer (Innoscience) against a U.S.-based patent owner (Efficient Power Conversion), but the challenge was instituted after completion of a week-long trial at the International Trade Commission (ITC) and during the process of post-trial briefing.
Recent Posts
- USPTO Study into Applications with Large Patent Families Raises Questions
- Agency’s Acting Deputy Director Says It’s Back to Basics for the USPTO
- Quantum Computers and the Evolution of AI | IPWatchdog Unleashed
- Second C4IP Congressional Scorecard Finds Pro-Innovation Efforts Lacking Among Most DC Lawmakers
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, May 30: Eighth Circuit Avoids Knowledge Standard Question Left by Unicolors; SCOTUS Denies Petition on Enablement Standard for Prior Art; USIJ Urges FTC to Look at PTAB Abuse