On Wednesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued an opinion affirming a district court’s decision to grant the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim in a contested patent case. Appellant/Plaintiff Eula Winfrey had initiated the claim in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, seeking “relief for the issue of two pillaged patents” as well as damages from the USPTO. The pro se argument was construed as having asserted claims under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), respectively.
Recent Posts
- CAFC Affirms Dismissal of APA, FTCA Claims in Patent Case
- Patent Owners Beware: Expanded Jurisdiction Risks in Using Third-Party Platforms to Remove Infringing Listings
- Bayh-Dole Coalition’s Innovation Award Winners Remind Us Why We Do What We Do
- Biological Deposits in Patent Applications: Why, When and Where
- Amici File Briefs Supporting Competing Petitions in $1 Billion Copyright Case Between Cox and Sony