On January 25, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential decision in Steuben Foods, Inc. v. Shibuya Hoppman Corp., reversing-in-part the District of Delaware’s post-trial rulings of judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) of noninfringement in favor of Shibuya. The Federal Circuit reversed noninfringement findings made under the reverse doctrine of equivalents (RDOE), declining to declare the doctrine subsumed by the 1952 Patent Act, but finding that Steuben Foods raised “compelling” arguments on that point. The opinion was authored by Chief Judge Moore.
Recent Posts
- IPWatchdog Unleashed: Patents and the Future of the USPTO in Trump’s Second Term
- No Infringement Intended – The World Wrestling Federation’s Biggest Fight: A Look at Trademark Law and Global Brand Recognition
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, February 7: CAFC Rejects Untimely Expert Testimony and Reassigns Case; CJEU Clarifies Online Marketplace Responsibilities Under GDPR; and IPWATCHPUPPIES ARE ON THE WAY!
- Commissioner for Patents Takes ‘Fork in the Road’ and Resigns from USPTO
- Reflections from an Inventor on the Return to Office Mandate for PTAB Judges