At the core of Due Process and basic justice is the undeniable right to be heard by an impartial adjudicator on the charges brought against you. That includes the right to present witnesses and evidence in your defense and to cross-examine the witnesses against you. Neither has been afforded to Judge Pauline Newman. Instead, allegations by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) chief judge, and certain staffers who report to the chief judge, are assumed to be both accurate and sufficient. Yet, Judge Newman has directly and publicly denied their accuracy and sufficiency.
Recent Posts
- UPC vs. EPO Oppositions: Lessons from Recent UPC Case Law
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, April 11: CAFC Denies Transfer of EDTX Patent Case; Texas Leads Entire U.S. in IP Exports; and Google Declines to Respond to Cellspin Soft Cert Petition
- Federal Circuit Issues Precedential Order Denying Mandamus Relief for SAP, Despite District Court Errors
- CAFC Affirms Dismissal of Opposition to iVoters Marks But Hints USPTO Should Reconsider Registration
- Why Creativity and Ownership Are Crucial to Innovation | IPWatchdog Unleashed