This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Supreme Court asks for the U.S. Solicitor General’s view on whether patents that claim a method of medically treating a patient automatically satisfy Section 101; a jury gives Qualcomm a win in its ongoing patent battle with Apple; the World Intellectual Property Office announces record-breaking totals for international patent applications and cybersquatting actions; Cisco avoids a nearly $60 million damages award at the Federal Circuit; McDonald’s appeals its loss in the EU over its Big Mac trademark; Tesla files trade secret lawsuits against former employees; Peloton faces a copyright suit from music publishers who are seeking $150 million; and Google gets another billion-dollar-plus fine from antitrust regulators in the EU.
Other Barks & Bites for Friday, March 22: Vanda Action at Supreme Court, Apple Has to Pay, and Senators Express Concerns Over Fourth Estate
No Comments
Business
- The USPTO Wants a Rehearing in Arthrex: Now is the Time to Put the PTAB on Trial
- One Inventor’s Unsolicited Congressional Testimony Following Arthrex
- How to Prepare and Prosecute Patents in Light of the USPTO’s Post-Alice Focus on Eligibility
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, November 29: China Pledges ‘Social Satisfaction’ on IP Protection and Nominates Candidate to Head WIPO
- Don’t Undermine U.S. Innovation While Standing Up to China
Recent Posts
- Another Front in China’s Economic War: Senate IP Subcommittee Seeks to Solve USPTO’s Fraudulent Chinese Trademarks Problem
- The USPTO Wants a Rehearing in Arthrex: Now is the Time to Put the PTAB on Trial
- One Inventor’s Unsolicited Congressional Testimony Following Arthrex
- How to Prepare and Prosecute Patents in Light of the USPTO’s Post-Alice Focus on Eligibility
- The Top Five Most Memorable Insurance Company Brand Personalities