This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Supreme Court finds that Georgia’s annotated state code is ineligible for copyright protection; the Federal Circuit issues decisions reversing the PTAB on nonobviousness and Northern California on Section 101 validity; the USPTO extends filing deadlines to June 1; a complex patent trial between Cisco and Centripetal Networks will begin on May 6; the TTAB affirms refusal to register a trademark after the applicant refuses to disclaim the merely descriptive term “LABS”; the Copyright Office begins a pilot program for electronic recordation; InterDigital signs a global 5G patent license with Huawei; and Amazon reports an increase in net sales for the first quarter of 2020.
Other Barks & Bites for Friday, May 1: CAFC Reversals, Copyright Office Launches Electronic Recordation Pilot, EPO and USPTO Issue Joint Statement on COVID-19
No Comments
Patent
- Enablement
- Fee Shifting
- Litigation
- This Week in Washington IP: Senate Commerce Committee to Grill Tech CEOs on Section 230, House Big Tech Antitrust Report and USPTO’s Quarterly TPAC Meeting
- Determining the Likelihood that an AI Patent Application Will Be Allowed at the USPTO
- Examining Samsung’s and LG’s LCD Patent Portfolios Following Decisions to Halt LCD Production
- Types of Subsequent Patent Applications in the United States (Part II)
- Will SCOTUS Tell Bad Spaniels to Roll Over?
Recent Posts
- This Week in Washington IP: Senate Commerce Committee to Grill Tech CEOs on Section 230, House Big Tech Antitrust Report and USPTO’s Quarterly TPAC Meeting
- Determining the Likelihood that an AI Patent Application Will Be Allowed at the USPTO
- Examining Samsung’s and LG’s LCD Patent Portfolios Following Decisions to Halt LCD Production
- Types of Subsequent Patent Applications in the United States (Part II)
- Will SCOTUS Tell Bad Spaniels to Roll Over?