This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Federal Circuit remands a “frustrating” patent case proceeding on an “impermissible theory of liability;” the Supreme Court questions counsel on the industry effects of copyright protections for software interfaces during oral arguments in Oracle v. Google; CRISPR gene editing inventors Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier awarded Nobel Prize; IBM announces that it will separate its managed infrastructure services unit to focus on its hybrid cloud business; and Regeneron seeks emergency approval for its COVID-19 therapy but also faces patent infringement charges over its use of a reagent used in vaccine testing assays.
Other Barks & Bites for Friday, October 9: SCOTUS Discusses Industry Effects of Oracle v. Google, USPTO Issues AI Report and CRISPR Inventors Win Nobel Prize in Chemistry
No Comments
Patent
- Enablement
- Fee Shifting
- Litigation
- From Agent to Examiner and Back Again: Practical Lessons Learned from Inside the USPTO
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, January 15: Copyright Office Issues Final Rule on Unmatched Musical Works Under MMA, $1 Billion Copyright Verdict Against Cox Communications Upheld, USPTO Publishes Report on China IP Filings
- USPTO Report Puts Chinese Innovation Growth in Context
- IFI Claims Reports: Patent Activity Increases Despite Pandemic, IBM Again Dominates Granted U.S. Patents, Samsung Leads Global 250
- Ericsson Wins Anti-Interference Injunction Against Samsung in Texas FRAND Case
Recent Posts
- From Agent to Examiner and Back Again: Practical Lessons Learned from Inside the USPTO
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, January 15: Copyright Office Issues Final Rule on Unmatched Musical Works Under MMA, $1 Billion Copyright Verdict Against Cox Communications Upheld, USPTO Publishes Report on China IP Filings
- USPTO Report Puts Chinese Innovation Growth in Context
- IFI Claims Reports: Patent Activity Increases Despite Pandemic, IBM Again Dominates Granted U.S. Patents, Samsung Leads Global 250
- Ericsson Wins Anti-Interference Injunction Against Samsung in Texas FRAND Case