ParkerVision, Inc. has filed a petition for writ of certiorari, docketed on Thursday, November 7, with the United States Supreme Court, presenting the question of whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s (CAFC’s) habit of issuing one-word affirmances under Rule 36(a) is prohibited under 35 U.S.C. § 144. The underlying cases stem from appeals of two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions in which the Board invalidated all challenged claims of ParkerVision’s U.S. Patent Nos. 7,292,835 and 7,110,444, geared generally to advanced wireless solutions for communications networks.
Recent Posts
- The Riyadh Design Law Treaty: Bringing Design Law into the Future
- Other Barks and Bites for Friday, December 6: GAO Releases Third-Party Litigation Funding Report; PQA Must Identify Members in VLSI Patent Litigation; CAFC Issues Two Precedential Decisions
- Newman Makes Another Bid to Reverse Suspension from CAFC
- CAFC Delivers Win for Meta in Precedential Decision
- USPTO Officially Withdraws Terminal Disclaimer Proposal