Since the Supreme Court issued its decision in Alice v. CLS Bank five years ago today, patent eligibility jurisprudence and practice have become increasingly chaotic—at least in the opinion of many IP stakeholders and the members of Congress who are spearheading the effort to rectify the situation. Today, to commemorate Alice’s five-year anniversary/ birthday, IPWatchdog posed the following—admittedly somewhat leading—statement to a cross-section of the IP community, and gave them a chance to agree or disagree with it. Many did not respond—including the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Google—perhaps because of the sensitive moment in the history of patent eligibility law in which we find ourselves right now. However, the responses below do reflect a range of views on the impact of the case so far.
Recent Posts
- $300 Million Damages Ruling for Optis Wiped Out by Federal Circuit Over Jury Instructions Violating Apple’s Seventh Amendment Rights
- Congress and Courts Need to Look in the Mirror When Asking Why Medical Innovation is Declining
- USPTO Hiring Freeze Ends, Patent Examiners Wanted
- Judiciary Committee Votes Squires Through 20-2
- Disney and Universal Become Latest to Sue Midjourney Over Generative AI Service