Imagine a pharmaceutical researcher in 2015 searching for new drug candidates to treat a rare disease. Through traditional methods, they might screen a few thousand compounds over several months, carefully evaluating each candidate’s potential based on known chemical properties and biological mechanisms. Fast forward to 2025: using modern AI tools, that same researcher can screen millions of compounds in days, with the AI system predicting binding affinities, potential side effects, and even suggesting novel molecular structures that human chemists might never have conceived. This dramatic expansion of capabilities raises a crucial question for patent law: Has the widespread adoption of AI tools fundamentally changed what constitutes “ordinary skill” in drug discovery?
Recent Posts
- AI and the Level of Ordinary Skill: Why Patent Law Must (and Can) Adapt to AI-Augmented Invention
- Federal Circuit Upholds PTAB Win for Patent to Detect Genetic Disorders
- CAFC Says Patent Claims Need Not Explicitly Disclose Material Benefits for Trademark Functionality Doctrine
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, January 3: Judge Stoll Faults CAFC Majority for Fact Finding, Darrell Issa to Chair House IP Subcommittee Again, and China to Subsidize Smartphone Sales
- Legislative Developments in Patents: Prospects for the PREVAIL and RESTORE Acts and PERA in 2025