Panelists on day one of IPWatchdog’s Artificial Intelligence Masters 2024 program painted a sometimes-grim picture of the current state of generative AI (GAI) tools and the ways in which they are currently being deployed in the United States, but seemed convinced overall that the kinks would be worked out once lawmakers and courts catch up, as they have done with past disruptive technologies.
Recent Posts
- Amici Urge SCOTUS to Address Uncertainty Around ‘After-Arising Technology’ Question
- Other Barks and Bites for Friday, October 10: SCOTUS Invites SG’s Views on RiseandShine’s Trademark Issues; MPA Urges OpenAI to Address Sora 2 Infringement; and UPC to Add Third Panel to Court of Appeal
- IP Experts Remind UKIPO: Global Device Markets Thrive Under Arm’s-Length SEP Licensing
- PERA 2025 Debated in Senate IP Subcommittee Hearing, with Business Methods, Diagnostics in Focus
- Patent Policy in the Trump Administration: What’s Next for the USPTO? | IPWatchdog Unleashed