A number of amici weighed in last week to urge the U.S. Supreme Court to grant a petition asking the Justices to consider whether “in a patent-infringement suit, a court may consider after- arising technology to hold that the patent is invalid under § 112(a) of the Patent Act.” The case arises from a U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) January 2025 precedential decision reversing a district court’s determination that certain claims of a patent for Novartis’ heart failure drug Entresto were invalid for lack of written description, and affirming a finding that the claims were not shown to be invalid for obviousness, lack of enablement, or indefiniteness.
The post Amici Urge SCOTUS to Address Uncertainty Around ‘After-Arising Technology’ Question appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law.
Recent Posts
- Amici Urge SCOTUS to Address Uncertainty Around ‘After-Arising Technology’ Question
- Other Barks and Bites for Friday, October 10: SCOTUS Invites SG’s Views on RiseandShine’s Trademark Issues; MPA Urges OpenAI to Address Sora 2 Infringement; and UPC to Add Third Panel to Court of Appeal
- IP Experts Remind UKIPO: Global Device Markets Thrive Under Arm’s-Length SEP Licensing
- PERA 2025 Debated in Senate IP Subcommittee Hearing, with Business Methods, Diagnostics in Focus
- Patent Policy in the Trump Administration: What’s Next for the USPTO? | IPWatchdog Unleashed