Several amici weighed in late last week on a trademark petition to the U.S. Supreme Court that asks whether “an award of a ‘defendant’s profits’ under the Lanham Act…can include an order for the defendant to disgorge the distinct profits of legally separate non-party corporate affiliates.” The Supreme Court granted the petition in Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc. in June, after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit endorsed a disgorgement remedy that reached into profits earned by affiliates of the petitioner, who were not included as defendants in the case, without any regard to principles of corporate veil piercing.
Recent Posts
- After Loper Bright, the USPTO Should Reopen the Comment Period for FY 2025-2029 Patent Fees
- Dissecting the USPTO’s Update to Eligibility Guidance for AI Inventions
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, October 4: Meta Hit with Class Action Copyright Infringement Lawsuit; Industry Leaders Ask for Clarification on Third-Party Litigation; EUIPO Applauds German Court Ruling on Misleading Invoices
- Patently Strategic Podcast: ITC Proofing Portfolios
- USPTO Says Order Terminating More than 3,000 Applications for Fraudulent Signatures is a Warning for Practitioners