On August 21, plant gene editing company Inari Agriculture filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court urging it to leave in place the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s precedential decision in In re: Cellect, which relates to the application of the obviousness-type double patenting (OTDP) doctrine in the context of patent term adjustments (PTA). Inari’s amicus brief was filed the same day that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) filed its brief in opposition to Cellect’s petition for writ of certiorari, arguing that the Federal Circuit was right to conclude that provisions governing PTA codified at 35 U.S.C. § 154 contemplates the application of OTDP doctrine to patents receiving PTA that are not terminally disclaimed to earlier-expiring patents claiming indistinct subject matter.
Recent Posts
- Perspectives on the PTAB’s 70% All Claims Invalidation Rate
- Moratorium on State AI Regulation Scrapped in Senate Version of Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’
- Increasing Volume of Patent Deals Could Signal Bounce in Patent Marketplace | IPWatchdog Unleashed
- How the USPTO Could Make a Permanent After-Final Consideration Program Work
- Other Barks and Bites for Friday, June 27: EGC Says ‘NERO CHAMPAGNE’ Unduly Exploits Protected Designation of Origin; SCOTUS Seeks SG Views on Skinny Label Issues in Hikma; and a Big Week for Copyrights and AI