On Wednesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision in Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings v. Qiagen Sciences, LLC reversing the District of Delaware’s denial of Qiagen’s motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) of non-infringement. The Federal Circuit found that the jury’s infringement verdict rested upon insufficient evidence, faulting the district court for improperly turning a claim construction matter over to the jury and for conducting an erroneous infringement analysis under the doctrine of equivalents.
Recent Posts
- CAFC Faults Delaware District Court for Allowing Jury to Decide Issue of Claim Construction
- Hoverboard Design Patent Owner Falls Flat at CAFC
- CAFC Vacates Non-Infringement Ruling for Apple Due to District Court Error in Striking Expert Opinion
- Federal Circuit Delivers 101 Victory for Patent Owner in Dumbbell Patent Case
- Lutnick Warns Harvard of Plan to March In on Patents