On Monday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential ruling in Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance v. CH Lighting Technology reversing the Western District of Texas’ judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) that Jiaxing’s patents were not invalid under the on-sale bar, and vacating the jury’s damages verdict. In relevant part, the Federal Circuit held that the district court erred in excluding evidence that prior art light-emitting diode (LED) tubes were on sale prior to the effective filing date of Super Lighting’s patents, prejudicing CH Lighting’s invalidity argument.
Recent Posts
- Former USPTO Solicitor Urges Squires Confirmation, Accuses Acting Director of Overreach
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, September 12: Novartis Loses Challenge to IRA Drug Price Negotiation Program; Lutnick Wants a Share of University IP Licensing; and EUIPO Announces First Copyright Conference
- Government Taking a Cut of University Royalties Would Threaten Bayh-Dole’s ROI
- Conservatives Appeal to Lutnick’s Inventor Roots in Urging Him to Drop ‘Patent Tax’ Proposal
- PTAB Turbulence: A Good Time to be a Patent Owner