On Monday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential ruling in Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance v. CH Lighting Technology reversing the Western District of Texas’ judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) that Jiaxing’s patents were not invalid under the on-sale bar, and vacating the jury’s damages verdict. In relevant part, the Federal Circuit held that the district court erred in excluding evidence that prior art light-emitting diode (LED) tubes were on sale prior to the effective filing date of Super Lighting’s patents, prejudicing CH Lighting’s invalidity argument.
Recent Posts
- CAFC Faults Western Texas for Excluding On-Sale Bar Evidence, Urgers Proper Daubert Analysis on Remand
- Federal Circuit Transfers Case to Second Circuit for Lack of Jurisdiction to Review Decision Stemming from Arbitration
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, July 25: Ninth Circuit Reverses $8 Million Ruling in Bored Ape Yacht Club Case; EGC Affirms EUIPO’s Cancellation of ICELAND Mark; and PTAB Returns to In-Person Hearings September 1
- Snap, Meta and X Defeat Xerox’s Appeal of PTAB Unpatentability Ruling at CAFC
- Trump AI Plan Would Penalize States with Regulations Deemed Burdensome