On Monday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential ruling in Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance v. CH Lighting Technology reversing the Western District of Texas’ judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) that Jiaxing’s patents were not invalid under the on-sale bar, and vacating the jury’s damages verdict. In relevant part, the Federal Circuit held that the district court erred in excluding evidence that prior art light-emitting diode (LED) tubes were on sale prior to the effective filing date of Super Lighting’s patents, prejudicing CH Lighting’s invalidity argument.
Recent Posts
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, November 7: CJEU Action Against EU Commission Referred Over SEP Regulation; Ninth Circuit Affirms CoComelon Copyright Win; and C4IP Urges USTR to Address IP Concerns in USMCA Joint Review
- Mixed UK High Court Ruling Fails to Answer Fundamental Questions of AI Copyright Infringement
- Professors Press SCOTUS to Affirm Copyright Protection for AI-Created Works
- Squires Emphasizes AI, Dubs Inherited Backlog ‘An Absolute Dumpster Fire’ and a ‘Betrayal’
- Federal Circuit Clarifies Precedent on Pre-AIA Prior Art ‘By Another’
