Today, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential decision in ZyXEL Communications Corp. v. UNM Rainforest Innovations affirming obviousness findings entered by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) over UNM Rainforest Innovations’ (UNMRI) arguments that ZyXEL’s expert witness misrepresented his contributions to an expert report relied upon by the Board. The Federal Circuit also reversed the PTAB’s finding that one of UNMRI’s challenged patent claims was nonobvious and remanded UNMRI’s substituted claims to the PTAB to consider if those claims are invalid under collateral estoppel.
Recent Posts
- Other Barks and Bites for Friday, December 6: GAO Releases Third-Party Litigation Funding Report; PQA Must Identify Members in VLSI Patent Litigation; CAFC Issues Two Precedential Decisions
- Newman Makes Another Bid to Reverse Suspension from CAFC
- CAFC Delivers Win for Meta in Precedential Decision
- USPTO Officially Withdraws Terminal Disclaimer Proposal
- Judge Newman’s Suspension by the CAFC Has Marred Public Faith in the Federal Judiciary