The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in a precedential decision today upheld two district court judgments for Apple, Inc. that found Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) had 1) abandoned its doctrine-of-equivalents theory (“WARF I”) and 2) that a second suit claiming infringement of the same patent via next-generation Apple products was barred by the previous decision (WARF II).
Recent Posts
- CAFC Nixes New Trial for WARF Against Apple on Doctrine-of-Equivalents Theory
- March-In Impact, Advice from In-House, and More on Day Two of IPWatchdog’s Women’s IP Forum
- Vidal Highlights Diversity as ‘National Imperative’ at Inaugural Women’s IP Forum
- CAFC Says District Court Must Redo Analysis of Attorneys’ Fees Award for DISH
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, August 23: Music Publishers Petition Supreme Court to Review Overturned $1 Billion Copyright Infringement Judgment; Nike Continues Trademark Infringement Lawsuit Against ‘Shoe Surgeon’