The Federal Circuit says that you must disclose and describe the prior art, or your Jepson claim is invalid. Obviously, this means that pretty much every Jepson claim in existence is now invalid. It also ensures that Jepson claims will never be used again. It is also truly a mystery why the Patent Office would ever defend this PTAB decision and advocate in favor of requiring the prior art to be disclosed, discussed and supported. The Office advocating such a nonsensical ruling makes absolutely no sense given the Office prefers Jepson format. Rule 1.75(e) specifically encourages Jepson claim format.
Recent Posts
- Closing the PTAB Loophole: Targeting Real Threats to U.S. Innovation Without Overreaching
- A Teapot Steeped with Dicta: An Update on In re Maatita and Design Definiteness
- Neurosurgeon Backing Judge Newman Defends Report Against CAFC Committee Criticisms
- SCOTUS Denies ParkerVision, Island IP and Other IP Petitioners Further Review
- mRNA Patent Wars Update: The Plot Thickens with Key Rulings Expected in 2025