The Federal Circuit recently reversed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) inter partes review decision on nonobviousness, holding that the Board erred when it did not require Synvina, the patent owner, to come forward with evidence of nonobviousness (e.g., teaching away) once DuPont, the petitioner, established the prior art disclosed an overlapping range for […] The post CAFC Reverses Nonobviousness Ruling in IPR as Board Failed to Apply Burden-Shifting Standard appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law.
Recent Posts
- Ninth Circuit Says Copyright Owner Can’t Subpoena Cox for Names of Users Showing Pirated Film
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, August 15: Korean Supreme Court Sides with Pinkfong in ‘Baby Shark’ Case; Ninth Circuit Says DTSA Claims Rarely Dismissible as Discovery Sanctions; and Trump Administration Mulls Investment Stake in Intel
- CAFC Faults Delaware District Court for Allowing Jury to Decide Issue of Claim Construction
- Hoverboard Design Patent Owner Falls Flat at CAFC
- CAFC Vacates Non-Infringement Ruling for Apple Due to District Court Error in Striking Expert Opinion