The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Friday in SoftView LLC v. Apple Inc. held that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) properly applied the estoppel provision of 37 CFR § 42.73(d)(3)(i) in invalidating Softview’s amended claims submitted in inter partes and ex parte reexaminations. The PTAB held and the CAFC affirmed that the claims were not patentably distinct from claims previously invalidated in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings involving SoftView, and the court upheld the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s authority under the America Invents Act (AIA) to promulgate the estoppel rules. However, the CAFC limited its application to new or amended claims and remanded the case for reconsideration of claims issued prior to the reexaminations.
Recent Posts
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, February 14: EU Commission Scraps SEP Draft Regulations; Senate Commerce to Explore Spectrum Auction Delays; House Science Seeks Review of Commercial Space Licensing
- Vidal Amicus Asks CAFC to Correct ED of TX Jury Instructions on Eligibility
- Revised Fair Use Ruling Finds No Transformative Use in Developing AI Search Tool
- Patently Strategic Podcast: Dealing with Rejection
- IPWatchdog Unleashed: Patents and the Future of the USPTO in Trump’s Second Term