On Friday, August 1, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential ruling in FMC Corp. v. Sharda USA, LLC vacating the Eastern District of Pennsylvania’s preliminary injunction order preventing Sharda from importing, selling or distributing its “WINNER” insecticide. The Federal Circuit found that the district court’s grant of injunctive relief rested on an erroneous claim construction for “composition” that failed to take into account the removal of references to stable compositions from the specification of the asserted patents.
Recent Posts
- Denmark: Political Parties Agree to Protect Danes Against Deepfakes
- CAFC Vacates Insecticide Injunction Due to Erroneous Claim Construction
- Trump Threatens Pharma to Deliver on Most Favored Nation Drug Pricing or Face Consequences
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, August 1: Senate Commerce Approves Advanced Manufacturing and Space Bills; Ninth Circuit Affirms Narrow Application of Jack Daniel’s; and EU Commission Confirms Withdrawal of AI Directive and SEP Regulation
- SEP ESP: Deciphering the United States’ Views on Irreparable Harm