On Monday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential opinion that vacated a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) ruling that a trademark registration from GPS vehicle tracking company Spireon was likely to be confused with three trademarks from supply chain management company, Flex LTD. The appeals court found that the TTAB made several significant errors and thus vacated and remanded the case. Flex LTD opposed Spireon’s FL FLEX trademark due to likely confusion with three of its marks, FLEX, FLEX (stylized), and FLEX PULSE. The TTAB determined whether there was a likelihood of confusion using the Dupont factors. The Board found that Flex’s marks were inherently distinctive under the first factor, and using the second, third, and thirteenth Dupont factors concluded that there was overlap between the two companies’ marks and ruled that Spireon registered its mark in bad faith.
Recent Posts
- In the Final Round of Harris vs. Trump: Who is Better for IP Rights?
- Cellspin Attempt at Recusal in Case Against Fitbit Falls Flat at CAFC
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, November 1: USCO Grants Right to Repair Copyright Exemption to Restaurants; EU Hits Teva with $503 Million Fine for Misusing Patent System; and Former USPTO Director Andrei Iancu Endorses Trump
- CAFC Affirms Several PTAB Findings that Centripetal’s Network Security Patent Claims are Obvious
- Perlmutter Gets Pressure from Congress to Release AI Reports