The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Thursday issued a precedential decision in Apex Bank v. CC Serve Corp., affirming-in-part, vacating-in-part, and remanding a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) refusing registration of the marks ASPIRE BANK. The opinion, authored by Circuit Judge Hughes, with Chief Judge Moore and Circuit Judge Cunningham joining, held that the TTAB correctly found the parties’ services highly similar under the second DuPont factor but erred in applying an inconsistent and overly narrow standard when analyzing third-party marks under the sixth DuPont factor.
The post CAFC Vacates TTAB Decision Over Inconsistent Application of DuPont Factors appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law.
Recent Posts
- CAFC Vacates TTAB Decision Over Inconsistent Application of DuPont Factors
- Squires Signs First Patents, Signals Commitment to Keep Emerging Technologies Eligible
- Trailblazer & Troublemaker: The Extraordinary Life Story of Judge Pauline Newman
- Judge Newman Asks Full D.C. Circuit to Make Good on ‘Virtual Invitation’ for En Banc Review
- Amgen Attacks Academics’ False Claims About Biologic Patents