Last month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held oral argument in Hyatt v. Stewart, which should be on everyone’s radar. Squarely presented in this case is the question of whether prosecution laches is a legitimate doctrine that can render any patent unenforceable if it takes longer than six years to obtain the patent from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). As crazy as it sounds, and to the surprise of many patent practitioners who have not paid careful attention to the development of Federal Circuit case law, in 2021 in Hyatt v. Hirshfeld the Federal Circuit ruled—rather improvidently—that a patent is presumed unenforceable if prosecution took longer than six years.
Recent Posts
- Can Judge Hughes Course Correct the CAFC on Prosecution Laches?
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, April 4: CAFC Corrects Date of Public Accessibility in Trade Secret Appeal; Sixth Circuit Issues Divided Opinion in Data Privacy Appeal; and OpenAI Urges Broad Copyright Exception in UK
- Federal Circuit Tells Patent Applicant Expired Patents Don’t Get Provisional Rights Either
- Senate Judiciary Committee to Consider Bills Targeting Pharma Patents and Pricing
- USPTO Acting Director Expands on Reasoning for New Interim PTAB ‘Workload Management’ Process