U.S. courts have long established that the owner of a product protected by a U.S. patent has the right to repair the product under the patent exhaustion doctrine (a.k.a. first-sale doctrine), under which the right to repair is generally interpreted to be a very broad right under U.S. patent law. A purchaser of the patented product may face some restrictions (e.g., preventing reconstruction of the item that goes well beyond simple wear-and-tear repairs), but overall courts have determined most modifications fall under the category of repair. This right to repair includes the right to select who repairs the product. But what happens when the product is purchased under a contract that includes a limitation on the right to repair, such as requiring the purchaser to use only the patent owner for repairs or prohibiting repair altogether?
Recent Posts
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, August 29: CAFC Affirms Prosecution Laches Ruling Against Hyatt; Trump Admin Cancels USPTO CBA; Second Circuit Affirms Lack of Standing in Ripple Trademark Case
- CAFC Dodges Key Issues in Reversing District Court Finding for Google on Prosecution Laches
- CAFC Corrects PTAB’s Inventorship Analysis in First Appeal of AIA Derivation Proceeding
- Brunetti’s Back: Split CAFC Rejects Most of Scandalous Trademark Applicant’s Arguments But Remands for Second Chance at TTAB
- CAFC is Unconvinced by Claim Construction Challenges to ITC’s Robotics Patent Infringement Finding