U.S. courts have long established that the owner of a product protected by a U.S. patent has the right to repair the product under the patent exhaustion doctrine (a.k.a. first-sale doctrine), under which the right to repair is generally interpreted to be a very broad right under U.S. patent law. A purchaser of the patented product may face some restrictions (e.g., preventing reconstruction of the item that goes well beyond simple wear-and-tear repairs), but overall courts have determined most modifications fall under the category of repair. This right to repair includes the right to select who repairs the product. But what happens when the product is purchased under a contract that includes a limitation on the right to repair, such as requiring the purchaser to use only the patent owner for repairs or prohibiting repair altogether?
Recent Posts
- Gaming Patent Litigation on Both Sides of the ‘v’ | IPWatchdog Unleashed
- Recentive Rehearing Petition Challenges CAFC’s Broad Section 101 Exclusion of Machine Learning Inventions
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, June 20: Advocate General Tells CJEU to Affirm €4 Billion Antitrust Fine Against Google; Recentive Challenges Section 101 Invalidation of Machine Learning Claims
- Stewart Expands on ‘Settled Expectations’ Criteria in Interim Discretionary Denial Process
- Mediocre Results so Far for Deferred Subject Matter Eligibility Response Pilot