On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Georgia et al. v. Public.Resource.Org., Inc. that a state code revision commission cannot claim copyright protection over annotated state code. The ruling upheld the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit’s 2018 decision in Code Revision Commission v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc., which reversed-in-part, vacated-in-part and remanded a lower court’s ruling in a copyright infringement case involving an annotated version of Georgia’s official state code. The decision was not a shock, but could have serious implications going forward. Here is what some members of the copyright bar had to say.
Copyright Lawyers on SCOTUS Decision in Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org: Expected, But Possibly Problematic
No Comments
Copyright
- Computer Law
- Fair Use
- First Sale Doctrine
- Washington Insiders Say Farewell to 2020 and Look Ahead to 2021
- Europe’s Top Five (Non-Patent) IP Developments of 2020
- Senator Tillis Releases Draft Bill to Modernize the Digital Millennium Copyright Act
- ‘We Want Action’: Rightsholder Reps Address Platforms in IP Subcommittee Hearing, as DMCA Reform Draft Looms
- Tillis Report Sums Up Senate IP Subcommittee’s Work on U.S. IP and Innovation
Recent Posts
- Washington Insiders Say Farewell to 2020 and Look Ahead to 2021
- Innovation Alliance Urges Biden Administration to Support Patent Rights
- From Agent to Examiner and Back Again: Practical Lessons Learned from Inside the USPTO
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, January 15: Copyright Office Issues Final Rule on Unmatched Musical Works Under MMA, $1 Billion Copyright Verdict Against Cox Communications Upheld, USPTO Publishes Report on China IP Filings
- USPTO Report Puts Chinese Innovation Growth in Context