“A” is one of the smallest words, but it is not the simplest—most Supreme Court judges can disagree on its meaning. In Niz-Chavez v. Garland, 141 S. Ct. 1474 (2021), the Court issued a 5-3 decision and held that “a” meant “one” in a statute regarding “a notice to appear.” Although the Niz-Chavez case is not about patent claim interpretation, it behooves us to pay attention to this tiny word. Soon after the Supreme Court decision, this issue has appeared again, this time in a patent case.
Recent Posts
- USPTO Hiring Freeze Ends, Patent Examiners Wanted
- Judiciary Committee Votes Squires Through 20-2
- Disney and Universal Become Latest to Sue Midjourney Over Generative AI Service
- Stewart Says USPTO Wants Early Validity Challenges, Not Late IPRs
- Solutions for a Better Patent System | IPWatchdog Unleashed