The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on Monday granted Katy Perry’s motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) and vacated the jury’s verdicts regarding liability and damages. In particular, the court found that the plaintiffs did not satisfy the extrinsic test, whereby the court determined whether any elements of plaintiffs’ eight-note ostinato (defined as “a continually repeated musical phrase or rhythm”) from the song “Joyful Noise” were protected and objectively similar to the allegedly infringing eight-note ostinato from Perry’s song “Dark Horse.”
Recent Posts
- Rio Tinto is Seeking an IP Counsel Innovation & Technology
- Moderna COVID Vaccine Technology Struck Down by PTAB
- IPWatchdog LIVE 2025 Panel Explores Global IP Trends
- Supreme Court Denies Cert on Section 101, Fraudulent Procurement of Trademark Petitions
- Putting AI Guardrails Around Output: A Texas Two-Step Around Training Data Infringement?