On May 14, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed a decision of the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Engineered Tax Services, Inc., v. Scarpello Consulting, Inc. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Scarpello, asserting that no reasonable jury could find ENGINEERED TAX SERVICES to be a valid trademark due to a lack of distinctiveness. Engineered Tax Services (ETS) appealed to the Eleventh Circuit, which found that a reasonable jury could have found the mark to be inherently distinctive.
Recent Posts
- CAFC Affirms TTAB’s Genericness Test for Color Marks
- AI and the Law: How Companies Can Navigate IP Risk and Seize Opportunity | IPWatchdog Unleashed
- Press Play on American IP: AI Can’t Scratch the Soundtrack to World IP Day
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, April 25: World IP Day 2025 Celebrates Musicians; Texas A&M to Lead Center for Advanced Aviation Technologies; and Tenth Circuit Affirms Specialty Metals Trade Secret Dismissal
- Judges Seem Frustrated with Judicial Council Arguments in Newman v. Moore Case