Earlier today, in cxLoyalty, Inc. v. Maritz Holdings, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part and dismissed-in-part a decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO’s) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in which the CAFC doubled down on its past contention that the USPTO’s Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance is not binding on the court’s analysis. The panel included Chief Judge Prost and Judges Lourie and Hughes. The opinion was authored by Prost.
Recent Posts
- CAFC Vacates Non-Infringement Ruling for Apple Due to District Court Error in Striking Expert Opinion
- Federal Circuit Delivers 101 Victory for Patent Owner in Dumbbell Patent Case
- Lutnick Warns Harvard of Plan to March In on Patents
- CAFC Delivers Win for LG in Reversal of $14 Million Award and Validity Ruling for Mondis
- Other Barks and Bites for Friday, August 8: CAFC Finds No Support for IDing ‘Type’ of Display Unit; Divided Fifth Circuit Panel Affirms Costs Award in G.I. Bro Copyright Case; and GSK to Receive $370 Million in mRNA Patent Settlement