Five years after the last of the four decisions in patent eligibility doctrine by the Supreme Court—creating what is now referred to as the Alice-Mayo framework—the impact of this upheaval in the patent system has become even more clear. Ongoing court decisions and new data confirm that the Alice-Mayo framework has wrought an unsettling revolution and sowed uncertainty in what former U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director David Kappos has referred to as the “the greatest innovation engine the world has ever known.” As policy debates on subject matter eligibility ramped up this past year, it is time to return back to the original dataset created by Robert Sachs and David Kappos that we presented in Turning Gold to Lead and provide an update.
Recent Posts
- $300 Million Damages Ruling for Optis Wiped Out by Federal Circuit Over Jury Instructions Violating Apple’s Seventh Amendment Rights
- Congress and Courts Need to Look in the Mirror When Asking Why Medical Innovation is Declining
- USPTO Hiring Freeze Ends, Patent Examiners Wanted
- Judiciary Committee Votes Squires Through 20-2
- Disney and Universal Become Latest to Sue Midjourney Over Generative AI Service