The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Friday addressed an issue of first impression in the patent eligibility context, holding that “claims that do no more than apply established methods of machine learning to a new data environment” are not patent eligible. Recentive Analytics, Inc. sued Fox Corp., Fox Broadcasting Company, LLC, and Fox Sports Productions, LLC for infringement of four U.S. Patent, Nos. 10,911,811; 10,958,957; 11,386,367; and 11,537,960. The patents are directed to solving problems in the entertainment industry and television broadcasting with respect to optimizing the scheduling of live events and “network maps,” which “determine the programs or content displayed by a broadcaster’s channels within certain geographic markets at particular times.”
Recent Posts
- Fox Succeeds in Scrapping Machine Learning Claims at CAFC Under 101
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, April 18: CAFC Affirms Ineligibility of Machine Learning Claims; EPO’s Campinos Issues Opinion on Intervener Appeals; USPTO Ends Climate Change Mitigation Program
- In Latest Antitrust Blow for Google, Judge Finds Search Giant Monopolizes Certain Ad Tech Markets
- New USPTO Group to Crack Down on Threats to U.S. Patent System
- IP, Globalization and the Future of Supply Chains: A Conversation with Sonja London | IPWatchdog Unleashed