Since the issuance by the United States Supreme Court of its opinion in Alice Corporation Pty Ltd. v. CLS Bank International, 573 U.S. 208, 134 S. Ct. 2347 (2014), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has increased its focus on patent eligibility. As a consequence, patent applicants now receive more claim rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 101, leading to protracted prosecution. While rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 101 are likely unavoidable, patent attorneys and agents can take steps during application preparation and prosecution to minimize the likelihood of such rejections and to successfully rebut such rejections when they do arise.
How to Prepare and Prosecute Patents in Light of the USPTO’s Post-Alice Focus on Eligibility
No Comments
Business
- The USPTO Wants a Rehearing in Arthrex: Now is the Time to Put the PTAB on Trial
- One Inventor’s Unsolicited Congressional Testimony Following Arthrex
- How to Prepare and Prosecute Patents in Light of the USPTO’s Post-Alice Focus on Eligibility
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, November 29: China Pledges ‘Social Satisfaction’ on IP Protection and Nominates Candidate to Head WIPO
- Don’t Undermine U.S. Innovation While Standing Up to China
Recent Posts
- Another Front in China’s Economic War: Senate IP Subcommittee Seeks to Solve USPTO’s Fraudulent Chinese Trademarks Problem
- The USPTO Wants a Rehearing in Arthrex: Now is the Time to Put the PTAB on Trial
- One Inventor’s Unsolicited Congressional Testimony Following Arthrex
- How to Prepare and Prosecute Patents in Light of the USPTO’s Post-Alice Focus on Eligibility
- The Top Five Most Memorable Insurance Company Brand Personalities