Director Iancu’s remarks gave a first look at what his reforms will look like, and by all indications these changes will be extremely innovator friendly… What has made the quartet of patent eligibility cases so devastating is how they have been stretched and pulled, twisted and manipulated to invalidate (and prevent) patent claims on innovations of entirely different magnitudes than those contemplated by the Supreme Court. Director Iancu understands that what the Supreme Court has actually said is quite limited. Director Iancu proposes that the USPTO strictly follow the Supreme Court, and nothing more.
The post Iancu Proposes Overcoming 101 ‘Morass’ by Strictly Following Supreme Court Precedent appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law.
Iancu Proposes Overcoming 101 ‘Morass’ by Strictly Following Supreme Court Precedent
No Comments
Patent
- Enablement
- Fee Shifting
- Litigation
- USPTO Precedential Opinion Panel Delivers Key Ruling for Inventors
- Key Points from Responses to Senator Hirono’s Questions to Section 101 Panelists
- As Stakeholders Await New 101 Bill, Responses to Tillis Underscore Need for Movement
- Federal Circuit Agrees That Argument-Based Prosecution Estoppel Barred Amgen from Succeeding on Infringement Claim
- Note to President Trump: Silicon Valley Pirates Are a Bigger Threat to Intellectual Property Than China
Recent Posts
- USPTO Precedential Opinion Panel Delivers Key Ruling for Inventors
- Key Points from Responses to Senator Hirono’s Questions to Section 101 Panelists
- As Stakeholders Await New 101 Bill, Responses to Tillis Underscore Need for Movement
- Creating a Home(work) Station That Gets Top Marks
- Federal Circuit Agrees That Argument-Based Prosecution Estoppel Barred Amgen from Succeeding on Infringement Claim