On Thursday, July 10, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will hear oral arguments in Google v. Sonos (No. 24-1097). Front and center in this appeal is the issue of prosecution laches. Sonos’ brief frames the question in this way: “Whether the district court erred in applying prosecution laches to declare the ‘885 and ‘966 patents unenforceable, based on nothing but standard continuation practice that did not extend the patents’ terms.”
Recent Posts
- Tariffs, Tech Wars, and Patent Turmoil: Navigating IP Strategy in a Rapidly Changing World | IPWatchdog Unleashed
- Life Sciences Masters Panelists Lament Mounting Policy Uncertainty
- Interveners Left Out in the Cold: EPO’s G 2/24 Tightens Rules for Late Parties to Patent Challenges
- Massie to Reintroduce RALIA in Bid to Abolish PTAB
- Reddit Dubs Perplexity AI and Data Scraping Companies ‘Would-Be Bank Robbers’
