As the United States gears up for the 2024 presidential election in two days, many in the IP community have been asking who would be better for IP rights? The question about whether a Harris Administration or second Trump Administration would be better on intellectual property rights from the perspective of rights holders is largely unknowable because neither party platform mentions “intellectual property” specifically, much less patents, trademarks or copyrights. And, like so many things in life, it all comes down to your perspective. The beauty on this particular issue is really in the eye of the beholder.
Recent Posts
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, October 17: CAFC Finds Prosecution Disclaimer in Examiner Acceptance of Patentee’s Scope; Japan Urges Opt-In Copyright Model for Sora 2; and Seventh Circuit Clarifies Evidence Required for Sound Recording Copyright Claims
- USPTO Issues NPRM on IPR Practice, Withdraws Vidal-Era Proposal
- Federal Circuit Finds No Due Process Violation Stems from Inconsistent Positions on Patent Ownership at PTAB, ITC
- UPC Issues First Permanent SEP Injunction: The Ramifications of Philips v. Belkin | IPWatchdog Unleashed
- Thaler Tells SCOTUS Refusing Copyright to AI-Generated Works Endangers Photo Copyrights, Too