The International Trademark Association (INTA) on Friday filed an amicus brief with the European Union Intellectual Property Office’s (EUIPO’s) Grand Board of Appeal, arguing that “the terms ‘public policy’ and ‘principles of morality’ are inherently vague and therefore carry with them a risk of an inconsistent application and a danger of each examiner being tempted to follow personal preferences rather than clear legal guidance” with respect to a trademark on the term “COVIDIOT” not being “fully in line with public standards.” The case is Matthias Zirnsack vs. EUIPO, Case R-260/2021-G.
Recent Posts
- Memo to the Supreme Court: The Enablement Requirement Needs Your Guidance—Again
- Federal Circuit Rejects US Inventor Bid for Rulemaking to Limit IPR/PGR Institution
- Amici Back AI Company’s Third Circuit Appeal of Summary Judgment for Thomson Reuters
- The AI Revolution: From Drilling to Algorithms, Inventing an Energy Future / IPWatchdog Unleashed
- CAFC Affirms Obviousness of Vehicle ID Claims, Finds Substitute Claims Ineligible Under Section 101