When it was announced that I would be testifying to the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on IP about Section 101, I was surprised. Not only did they grant a critic of the 101 roundtables a chance to speak, but not one inventor who used patents to fund a startup has testified in any patent-related hearing in decades. This gave me faith that Senators Tillis and Coons are serious about fixing 101 right by considering what inventors need. When the hearing was announced, several inventors contacted me. They wanted to personally tell their stories to Congress. They trusted the government to protect them, but instead lost their careers, their secrets, and their investments of hard work and money. A few even lost their families, their home, or their health. The inventors were happy about eliminating all 101 exceptions, but the draft language of 100(k) and 112(f) transfer the damage to those sections.
Business
- Examining Samsung’s and LG’s LCD Patent Portfolios Following Decisions to Halt LCD Production
- DOJ Takes Key Step Toward Breaking Up Big Tech with Antitrust Complaint Against Google
- 3D Printing: Adoptability, Assurance, IP and Consumer Concerns
- Don’t Let the Pandemic End Your Startup: Tips for Shoring Up Agreements Among Business Partners
- Eagle Forum Event Focuses on IP, Antitrust Nexus
Recent Posts
- Patent Filings Roundup: Super-NPE Armed with New Patent Strikes Municipalities; Supersonic DJ Suit Over Army Sonar Contract; New Far North Campaign Against Cable Companies
- American Innovators Express Support for Recent and Proposed Changes in Patent System
- This Week in Washington IP: Senate Commerce Committee to Grill Tech CEOs on Section 230, House Big Tech Antitrust Report and USPTO’s Quarterly TPAC Meeting
- Determining the Likelihood that an AI Patent Application Will Be Allowed at the USPTO
- Examining Samsung’s and LG’s LCD Patent Portfolios Following Decisions to Halt LCD Production