(Sept. 24, 2014) Japan’s Geographical Indication (GI) Act was promulgated on June 25, 2014. (Act No. 84, 2014, Tokutei Norin Suisan Butsu to no Meisho no Hogo ni Kansuru Horitsu; text of the legislation, which became law without change, available on the House of Representatives website [in Japanese].) The Act aims to protect producers of certain agricultural products, promote local agricultural and food brands, and protect consumers. (Id. art. 1.) The Act will become effective within one year. (Id. Supplementary Provisions, art. 1.)
The products protected under the Act are those produced in a particular region, using a method unique to that area, thus linking a product’s quality and reputation to its geographical origin. (Id. art. 2 ¶ 2.) To be protected under the Act, registration of the product by a local producers’ association is required. (Id. art. 6.) The local producers’ association must establish a quality standard for the product, with such factors as the production method, geographic area, and minimum sugar content. (Id. art. 7.) Producers’ associations will be responsible for checking whether products marketed under registered brand names meet the standard. (Id. arts. 2 ¶ 6 & 13 ¶ 1 item 2.) Registered products will be allowed to bear a logo to indicate they are certified. (Id. art. 4.)
There is already in place a regional collective trademark system that allows registration of marks consisting of a regional name and a generic name. (Trademark Act, Act No. 127 of 1959, art. 7-2, inserted by Act No. 56 of 2005.) Under the trademark system, producers are not obliged to set any criteria to register a product, and only members of the organization that registered the product have the right to use the trademark. (Geographical Indication Law – A Push for Local Brand Promotion, JAPAN AGRI NEWS (June 19, 2014).)
Under the new system, “only the products which meet the quality standard will be allowed to bear the brand labels, the use of labels will not be limited to certain organizations, and the government will be responsible for dealing with misuse and counterfeiting.” (Diet Enacts Geographical Indication Law, JAPAN AGRI NEWS (June 18, 2014).) Producers can use both the GI system and the regional collective trademark system.
- Christmas 2021: Iconic Patented Toys and Games Update – and Trademarks Too!
- Trademark, Design and Copyright Landmarks in Europe During 2021
- Key Developments that Shaped the USPTO in 2021
- Trademarks in 2021: Recounting the Most High-Profile Trademark Developments of the Year
- USPTO Imposes Sanctions on Flagrant Fraudulent Filer
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, January 21: CNIPA Announces Rapid Trademark Examination Measures, SCOTUS Asked to Clarify Octane Fitness Standard, and Qualcomm Opposes Apple’s Petition on Article III Standing
- Green Light for Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court
- Tillis to Garland/ Kanter: Pursuit of New Draft Policy on SEPs Shows a ‘Failure of innovation Leadership’
- Knowledge Ecology International’s New March-In Petition is Déjà vu All Over Again – With One Twist
- Property Rights Groups Urge Garland and Kanter to Withdraw ‘Misguided’ Policy Statement on SEPs Subject to FRAND