On Sunday, September 30th, U.S. District Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York signed a memorandum opinion and order that was officially entered the following day in a trademark case brought by pop music superstar Beyoncé Giselle Knowles-Carter against Feyonce, Inc., a developer of merchandise marketed to engaged people using the brand name Feyoncé. Although the court found no dispute that the mark “FEYONCÉ” was chosen with the intent to capitalize on the famous “BEYONCÉ” mark, Beyoncé’s motion for a permanent injunction couldn’t be granted on summary judgment because there remains a genuine dispute of material fact regarding whether a jury would find that a rational consumer would mistakenly believe an affiliation between the two brands.
The post Judge Denies Beyoncé Motion for Summary Judgment in Feyoncé Trademark Case appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law.
Judge Denies Beyoncé Motion for Summary Judgment in Feyoncé Trademark Case
No Comments
Litigation
- CAFC Affirms Ruling that Patent Owner Engaged in Abusive Litigation Tactics Against IBM, SAP and JP Morgan Chase
- The New Copyright Small Claims Board Presents Problems for Copyright Owners and Small Businesses
- Dyk Splits from CAFC Panel on Application of Collateral Estoppel to Inter Partes Reexaminations
- CAFC Reverses In-Part, Vacates In-Part PTAB Finding of Patentability for Skin Cancer Detection Device
- UK Judge Backs Meghan Markle over Leaked Letter
Recent Posts
- CAFC Affirms Ruling that Patent Owner Engaged in Abusive Litigation Tactics Against IBM, SAP and JP Morgan Chase
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, March 5: China Leads World in 2020 PCT Filings, Copyright Office Issues Rules on Music Modernization Act, and USIJ Urges President Biden to Pick Patent-Friendly USPTO Director
- Balancing Innovation and Competition: Thomas Jefferson’s View of Obviousness for Mechanical Inventions
- Design Patents: Under Utilized and Overlooked
- Deciding Where to Obtain International Patent Rights