The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Unicolors v. H&M. The case asks the Court to decide whether the Ninth Circuit properly construed the language of 17 U.S.C. § 411 relating to whether courts must have evidence of intent to defraud before referring copyright registration validity questions to the Copyright Office. While the questioning seemed to favor Unicolors overall, at least one Justice today asked why a change in the question presented at the merits stage of the briefing shouldn’t result in the case being dismissed as having been “improvidently granted.”
Recent Posts
- Anthropic to Pay Largest Publicly Reported Copyright Settlement in History
- Pro Se Applicant Gets USPTO’s 101 Rejection Vacated at CAFC
- Split Third Circuit Upholds Medicare Price Negotiation Program Under Biden IRA
- U.S. Chamber-Led Coalition Joins Voices Telling Commerce to Nix Valuation-Based Patent Fee Proposal
- Trump Order Bars USPTO Patents Employees from POPA Membership But Will Not Yet Affect Telework