The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., Cytyc Surgical Products, LLC, which essentially asks the Court to decide whether the doctrine of “assignor estoppel”—which bars the assignor of a patent from later attacking the patent’s validity—should be scrapped, retained or limited. The Court’s questioning indicated that it seems uncomfortable with discarding the doctrine entirely, as Minerva would like.
Recent Posts
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, September 26: Trump Announces 100% Tariff on Patented Pharmaceuticals; Judge Alsup Approves $1.5 Billion Anthropic AI Settlement; and DOJ Weaponization Group Reportedly Investigating Secret Patent Reviews
- CAFC Vacates TTAB Decision Over Inconsistent Application of DuPont Factors
- Squires Signs First Patents, Signals Commitment to Keep Emerging Technologies Eligible
- Trailblazer & Troublemaker: The Extraordinary Life Story of Judge Pauline Newman
- Judge Newman Asks Full D.C. Circuit to Make Good on ‘Virtual Invitation’ for En Banc Review
