Reading the recent opinion of Judges Prost and Taranto in Yu and Zhang v. Apple and Samsung, Appeal Nos. 2020-1760, 1803 (Fed.Cir. June 11, 2021), I’m reminded of something Mark Twain never said: “There’s a lie, there’s a damned lie, and then there’s an Alice-Mayo decision.” Granted, it is hard to tell one Alice-Mayo decision from another. At face value, the Yu decision appears to be merely the latest absurdist fiction in a collection of short stories based on the abandonment of conventional law. Yet, the Yu decision is more than the typical Alice-Mayo scenario where logical construction and argument give way to irrationality in a senseless judiciary.
Recent Posts
- IP News: Barks & Bites for Friday, March 21 | IPWatchdog
- The Outlook for SEPs in 2025: Anti-Suit Injunctions, DOJ Policy and GenAI
- Can State Law Contracts Limit the Right to Repair Even When Patent Protections Exhaust?
- Scarcity or Abundance Mindset? How Scarcity-Minded Leaders Undermine Team Culture and Potential
- ParkerVision v. Rule 36 | Patently Strategic Podcast