Congress created Inter Partes Review (IPR) to weed out clearly invalid patents that would not have been issued had the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) known about certain prior art. However, USPTO Director Iancu should consider limiting his delegated authority in 35 U.S.C. § 325(d) to prior art that was not presented to the USPTO during examination. As such, all references in the prosecution record would be presumed to have been fully considered by the examiner and could not form any part of a post grant petition. This change would exercise the discretion provided by Congress to its fullest, preserve USPTO resources by not reconsidering the Office’s prior decisions, and restore some predictability to the U.S. patent system.
The post Limiting Section 325(d) Delegation Will Ensure a More Predictable Inter Partes Review Process appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law.
Recent Posts
- CAFC is Unconvinced by Claim Construction Challenges to ITC’s Robotics Patent Infringement Finding
- D.C. Circuit Kills Judge Newman’s Appeal While Hinting at Constitutional Problems with Suspension
- CAFC Affirms Decreased Damages Ruling for Tennis Let Detection Patent But Reverses Denial of Post-Judgment Interest
- C4IP Urges FTC to Proceed with Caution on Addressing Perceived Drug Pricing Problems
- CAFC Affirms PTAB Finding that Glucose Sensor Patent Claims are Obvious