The sole question on appeal was whether it would have been obvious to make zolmitriptan into a nasal spray. The Federal Circuit agreed with the district court that the prior art taught away from formulating zolmitriptan for intranasal administration.
The post Nasal Spray Patents Covering Migraine Drug Zomig Not Invalid As Obvious appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law.
Recent Posts
- The Personal Side of Patents: The Battle for Life-Saving Drugs | IPWatchdog Unleashed
- CAFC Majority Reverses PTAB Obviousness Ruling Over Dissent, But Rule 36 Issues Persist for CPC Patent
- Liability Risks Before the UPC: How U.S. Companies Need to Prepare
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, November 7: CJEU Action Against EU Commission Referred Over SEP Regulation; Ninth Circuit Affirms CoComelon Copyright Win; and C4IP Urges USTR to Address IP Concerns in USMCA Joint Review
- Mixed UK High Court Ruling Fails to Answer Fundamental Questions of AI Copyright Infringement