One advantage a non-practicing entity (NPE) has for collecting damages through patent infringement litigation is that there is no obligation to mark a product prior to collecting damages, whereas the marking statute (35 U.S.C. §287) requires a patent holder to mark the patent number on a commercial embodiment of its invention (i.e., the product or service it uses, sells or offers to sale) in order to collect damages for infringement. However, what happens after an NPE settles a patent infringement case with a defendant that produces a product or service, and that product or service was the accused instrumentality in the patent infringement lawsuit?
Recent Posts
- Other Barks and Bites for Friday, June 27: EGC Says ‘NERO CHAMPAGNE’ Unduly Exploits Protected Designation of Origin; SCOTUS Seeks SG Views on Skinny Label Issues in Hikma; and a Big Week for Copyrights and AI
- PTAB Designates Informative Director Review Decision Vacating Institution of Two Petitions Challenging Same Claims
- Stewart Grants Discretionary Denial Due to Patent Being Dismissed From Litigation
- U.S. Government’s Intervention in Patent Case Signals Good News for Patent Owners Seeking Injunctions
- Gaming Patent Litigation on Both Sides of the ‘v’ | IPWatchdog Unleashed