This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Second Circuit affirms a jury’s co-ownership finding to a trademark registration for the mark ZIONESS but reverses the denial of attorney’s fees for erroneous analysis of prevailing parties; the Federal Circuit tells the Delaware district court that “as a matter of claim construction… ‘identical’ means the same” in reversing a denial of JMOL of non-infringement; and more.
Recent Posts
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, August 15: Korean Supreme Court Sides with Pinkfong in ‘Baby Shark’ Case; Ninth Circuit Says DTSA Claims Rarely Dismissible as Discovery Sanctions; and Trump Administration Mulls Investment Stake in Intel
- CAFC Faults Delaware District Court for Allowing Jury to Decide Issue of Claim Construction
- Hoverboard Design Patent Owner Falls Flat at CAFC
- CAFC Vacates Non-Infringement Ruling for Apple Due to District Court Error in Striking Expert Opinion
- Federal Circuit Delivers 101 Victory for Patent Owner in Dumbbell Patent Case