This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Federal Circuit reversed a District of Delaware ruling after finding that the court’s sua sponte Section 101 invalidation of patent claims violated the statutory presumption of validity under Section 282; California joins Tennessee and Illinois in enacting state bills providing remedies against unauthorized digital replicas of individuals; an Eastern District of New York magistrate judge recommends granting Gilead Sciences’ contempt motion against an individual defendant in an HIV counterfeit drug case.
Recent Posts
- Other Barks and Bites for Friday, January 17: Teva Files IRA Challenge Amid Second Round of Medicare Negotiations; Ninth Circuit Says Kinetic Sculptures Can Be Sufficiently ‘Fixed’ for Copyright; USPTO Publishes Inventorship FAQs for AI-Assisted Inventions
- USPTO Fee Report: Discounts Don’t Cut It for Incentivizing New Patent Participants
- Federal Circuit Splits on Whether Toddler Tub May Infringe
- CAFC Rules Patent Applications are Considered Pre-AIA Prior Art By Filing Date, Not Publication Date
- The Biden Administration Rolls the Dice on NIH Patent Licensing